Rights: Evaluation

FAQ

How often are teachers evaluated?
What is the recourse when denied a 5-year evaluation?

Send a copy of your denial. A highly qualified means No Child Left Behind compliant, not a score of 5. Please notify the MTA office if a lack of friendliness, insufficient professional development, or not on leadership is the reason for denial.

How often are teachers evaluated?

Probationary teachers shall be evaluated at least once each school year [Article VIII.C.8]. Permanent teachers who receive a “satisfactory” evaluation shall be evaluated once every two years regardless of assignment, transfer, etc [Article VIII.C.9]. *Evaluation of a permanent certificated employee may be at least every five years based on certain conditions being met [Article VIII.C.10].

What is the instructional employee responsible for?

All instructional employees shall be responsible for two (2) professional goals. One (1) goal shall be identified by the instructional employee and related to the District annual focus. One (1) goal will be identified by the instructional employee, representing a major component of his/her growth as a professional. Both goals must be mutually agreed upon by the instructional employee and the evaluator. Any appeal will be presented to the evaluator’s Senior Director for resolution [Article VIII.A.3].

The administrator can not dictate a list of objectives. The evaluation and assessment of instructional employee competence shall not include the use of publishers’ norms established by standardized tests and consideration of mitagating factors should be included.

What are the procedures for plan of improvement?

The Plan of Improvement is intended to help the certificated employee by establishing a clear plan for support including coaching, feedback, and a commitment for support, resources, and follow-up by the evaluator. The evaluator shall commit to being clear on support and resources available. In consideration of individual needs, the Plan of Improvement duration shall be determined by the evaluator in consultation with the certificated employee. The plan of improvement shall be a minimum of four (4) weeks in length, and with mutual consent, may be extended as necessary. In no case shall there be a formal observation of the certificated employee before the four (4) weeks have lapsed [Article VIII.D.2].

What are the time frames for evaluation forms?

Completed evaluation forms for all personnel subject to evaluation during that year shall be transmitted by the evaluator to the evaluatee not later than thirty (30) days prior to the last day of that evaluation year. The entire evaluation process, including all forms and meetings, shall be completed within the school year in which the evaluation began. The evaluator and evaluatee shall discuss the completed evaluation forms prior to the last school day of the evaluation year. [Article VIII.C.16].

Disclaimer:
This source provides general information about rights. The information made available is subject to change without notice. It does not provide legal advice and user assumes the risk of verifying any materials used or relied upon.

MTA Scholarships

2025 MTA Scholarship Winners

2025 Scholarship Winners

The Jon Walther Memorial Teaching Scholarship honors Jon Walther, who spent most of his career teaching English at Downey High School and served as president of MTA. Its purpose is to encourage young people to follow in Mr. Walther’s footsteps and pursue careers in education.

The scholarship is awarded to students, one per high school, who wish to pursue teaching as their profession and who demonstrate excellence during their high school careers.

The Cecil Curfman Memorial Scholarship was established in recognition of Mr. Curfman’s service to the teaching profession. Cecil Curfman was a long-time social science teacher at La Loma Junior High, and a leader in both the California Teachers Association and the National Education Association.

The scholarship is awarded to the dependents of MTA members who demonstrate excellence during their high school careers.

The Frank Vandervort Memorial Scholarship honors Frank Vandervort, who served as Executive Director of the Modesto Teachers Association for 15 years after 8 years as President. Frank is remembered for his comprehensive knowledge of the contract, his tenacious representation of members, and his ability to secure grievance settlements.

This scholarship is awarded to a high school senior who is strong in academics and school activities, and whose parent has been active in MTA.


Recipients

Jon Walther Memorial Teaching Scholarship

Araceli Alvardo|Downey

Gabriela Alvarez|Enochs

Angela Arroyo|Modesto

Jenna Harmon|Enochs

Jordyn Lish|Beyer

Elora Tornberg|Enochs

Maya Wolfe|Modesto

Cecil Curfman Memorial Scholarship

Georgia Beebe|Davis – Julie Beebe/Davis

Zoe Leach|Downey – Michael & Amy Leach/Roosevelt & Modesto

Natalie Mariano|Enochs – Sara Mariano/Enochs

Stella McDaniel|Gregori – Scott McDaniel/Downey

Addison O’Brien|Beyer -Kristen O’Brien/Elliott

Luke Ojcius|Downey – Samuel Ojcius/Transitions

Maya Wolfe|Modesto – Michele Beaton/Wright

Frank Vandervort Memorial Scholarship

Jordyn Lish|Beyer – Sean & Julie Lish/Beyer & Marshall

Elora Tornberg|Enochs – Joe & Suzi Tornberg/Shackelford & El Vista

2025 MTA scholarship winners

Rights: Transfers

FAQ

What are the transfer & reassignment timelines?

The Association and District agree to the following Transfer & Reassignment timelines, to be further detailed in [Article XIII, B.1a-g] and in Article XIV Reassignments.

  • By first Friday following winter break, the District will notify all bargaining unit members describing the internal round process.
  • Prior to March 1: Overstaffing process completed
  • Internal Round (as defined below)
  • Upon completion of Internal Round: For no more than ten (10) work days, new hires from the District New Hire Pool will be placed into unfilled vacancies.
How is an internal round defined?

Following review of staffing levels and site/District needs, including completion of the overstaffing process, the following process shall be used to fill vacant positions prior to assigning recruit candidates. By first Friday following winter break, the District will notify all bargaining unit members describing the internal round process, which will include the following:

  • Internal Round Window dates.
  • A description of application process.
  • A bargaining unit member’s most recent evaluation must be satisfactory.
  • A bargaining unit member must respond to an offer within 24 hours.
  • If there is only one applicant the unit member will be granted an interview with the site administrator.
  • A bargaining unit member granted a transfer will remain on his/her evaluation cycle subject to the terms in the evaluation article [Article XIII, F.1a-c].
What is the procedure for an administrative transfer exclusive of shifting/declining enrollment?

The site administrator meets with the credentialed employee to notify the employee of the proposed transfer. Within five (5) working days after the meeting the employee is notified in writing of his/her probable transfer prior to its submission to the Superintendent or his/her designee. The employee shall be advised that he/she has specified time requirements to meet. Except in extraordinary cases, prior to initiating an administrative transfer the site administrator shall have had multiple documented meetings, such as conference summaries, desk memos, letters of reprimand, notice of unprofessional conduct, or unsatisfactory observations/evaluations, etc. to address concerns with the certificated employee. Involuntary administrative transfers shall not be arbitrary or capricious [Article XIII, C.1-5].

Disclaimer:
This source provides general information about rights. The information made available is subject to change without notice. It does not provide legal advice and user assumes the risk of verifying any materials used or relied upon.